PoliceComplaint.com

Police accountability data

Who polices the police?

The oversight bodies publish the numbers. We make them readable, force by force.

24.5%of reviewed complaint outcomes overturned
44UK forces, each with its own record
1,397,874stop and search records analysed

Every year the police are complained about hundreds of thousands of times. What happens next is recorded, published, and almost never read. We compile that record and publish it in full, 44 UK forces, every figure carrying its source and its date.

Why this site exists

Two reasons, and they are the same reason.

So the public can act. Someone deciding whether to complain about their local force deserves to know whether complaining works there. That is a knowable fact. It is published every year. It has simply never been put anywhere an ordinary person would find it.

So forces can be held to it. Accountability data only changes behaviour when somebody is looking at it. A force whose complaint decisions are overturned six times more often than its neighbour's should have to answer for that, and it can only be asked if the comparison exists.

We take no position on any individual case and make no allegation against any officer or force. We publish what the oversight bodies published, in a form people can use.

What we hold

1,397,874
stop and search records analysed
data.police.uk, 2023-07 to 2026-06
44
UK police forces, each with its own page
IOPC and Home Office
3,354,766
use of force reports, five-year series
Home Office, 2020/21 to 2024/25
1
official data sources, compiled from the publishers
UK: IOPC, data.police.uk, Home Office, ONS · US: Mapping Police Violence, Census Bureau · AU: Report on Government Services
15,550
US people killed by police recorded, 2015 to 2024
Mapping Police Violence

Does complaining actually work?

When a force finalises a complaint and the complainant asks for a review, the reviewing body records whether the force's own outcome was reasonable and proportionate. Nationally it was found not reasonable and proportionate in 24.5% of completed reviews.

Under 10%: 3 forces Under 10% 3 10 to 18%: 10 forces 10 to 18% 10 18 to 26%: 16 forces 18 to 26% 16 26 to 34%: 9 forces 26 to 34% 9 Over 34%: 5 forces Over 34% 5
Number of forces in each band, by the share of reviewed complaint outcomes found not reasonable and proportionate. IOPC, 2024/25. Forces completing fewer than 30 reviews are excluded.

The spread is the finding. The highest force overturns roughly six times as often as the lowest, which is far too wide a gap to be explained by the complaints themselves. See every force ranked.

Force is being used far more than it was

Recorded use of force across England and Wales has risen sharply in five years, and the increase is not evenly spread, some forces have more than quintupled while the largest has fallen by nearly two fifths.

2020/21: 562k 562k 2020/212021/22: 608k 608k 2021/222022/23: 659k 659k 2022/232023/24: 728k 728k 2023/242024/25: 797k 797k 2024/25
Recorded use of force reports across England and Wales, all forces combined. Home Office, 2020/21 to 2024/25.

Free tools

No sign-up, nothing stored, and every result has a link you can share.

What the figures show

All computed from published data. Nothing estimated.

24.5%

of reviewed complaint outcomes were found not reasonable and proportionate. Every force ranked

70.8%

of 1,397,874 recorded stop and searches ended in no further action.

18,099

searches involved removal of more than outer clothing.

3

forces published no stop and search data at all. How we handle gaps

The two reports worth reading first

Who gets stopped and searched

Every force ranked on how far its stop and search falls on one ethnic group against that group's share of the force area's own population, computed from the 2021 Census. The forces we cannot compute are named too.

Deaths following police contact

The IOPC's categories, kept separate rather than collapsed into one figure, across the full published series.

Were any US officers charged

Of 15,550 deaths involving US police since 2013, the share where any officer faced a criminal charge, and how those prosecutions ended.

Why we publish this

Police forces are among the few institutions that can detain you, search you, use force against you and, in some countries, kill you lawfully. The justification for those powers is that they are accountable ones. Accountability is only real if the numbers are visible.

Most of this data is already public. Almost none of it is readable.

It is published as spreadsheets, statistical bulletins and API endpoints, in separate places, on different schedules, without the population denominators you need to compare one force against another. A person who was stopped and searched last week cannot use any of that. We do the joining, state the denominator, and publish the result per force and per department.

People do not complain because they do not know they can

The single biggest barrier to police accountability is not the complaints system. It is that most people never find it. Every force page here ends with the actual route: who to contact, what happens next, and what the deadline is. That is the whole reason the data pages and the complaint pages sit on the same site.

Comparison is what creates pressure

A force reading its own figure sees a number. A force sitting in a ranked table beside its neighbours sees a position. Published comparison is what has historically moved policing practice, from stop and search disparity to body-worn video, and it works in every country that publishes the data.

So the aim is plain: better policing through visible accountability, and a public that knows what its own police force actually does and how to challenge it. That is why this site is free, why every figure names its source and its period, and why we publish the gaps and the non-responses as prominently as the headline numbers. A statistic that flatters us but cannot be checked is worth nothing here.

Publishing a figure is not making an accusation. A recorded complaint is an allegation, not a finding. A measured disparity is a difference in outcomes, not proof that anyone acted unlawfully. We set out the limits of every dataset on the disclaimer page, and we correct anything shown to be wrong.

Where the data comes from

1 official sources, pulled from the publishers themselves and recomputed here, not copied from anyone's summary. Filter by country.

Australia

Report on Government Services

Complaints about police conduct per 100,000 people and per 100 sworn staff, and deaths in police custody by Indigenous status, for all eight states and territories. Published by the Productivity Commission under CC BY 4.0.

Tables 6A.11 and 6A.5 · 8 jurisdictions · 2007-08 to 2024-25

Computed data currently covers England and Wales (the UK section), the United States and Australia.

Four more jurisdictions have their own pages covering how complaints actually work there, without statistics. Where a country has no dataset we can compute from, we say so rather than implying we hold data we do not:

Scotland

Police Scotland and the PIRC

A separate system from England and Wales, with its own body, its own review route and its own deadlines. Police Scotland does not report into data.police.uk.

Northern Ireland

The Police Ombudsman

The most independent complaints system in the UK: complaints about the PSNI go straight to an independent Ombudsman rather than to the police first.

Ireland

An Garda Síochána and Fiosrú

GSOC became Fiosrú in 2026 and takes complaints directly. No Irish police complaints dataset exists: we checked all 12,985 CSO tables.

Canada

The CRCC and the provinces

Oversight splits between a federal body for the RCMP and separate provincial ones. Statistics Canada publishes no national police accountability data: we checked all 8,229 of its datasets.

How we handle the numbers

Computed

Never generated

Every figure is calculated in code from the source records. No number here is estimated, rounded by hand, or produced by a language model.

Denominators

Shown, not hidden

Rates are calculated only over records where the field was actually completed, and we publish the numerator, the denominator and the coverage.

Gaps

Published as findings

Where a force recorded almost nothing, that is the story. We do not quietly drop it to make a table look tidier.

How the figures are compiled